Ames Smith, Attorney at Law
  • Home
  • About
  • Practice Areas
  • Posts

Introduction to Prenuptial Agreements in California

3/30/2015

1 Comment

 
Authors: Roxana Ahmadian and Ames Smith

What is a prenuptial agreement?

A prenuptial or premarital agreement (also known as a “prenup”) is a contract signed by a couple before marriage (or domestic partnership) that specifically describes how the couple’s assets will be divided in the event of divorce. However, prenups are not limited to the division of assets. Prenuptial agreements can set terms and conditions for many other aspects of the marriage.

In California, the right to a prenuptial agreement is codified by California Family Code section 1500, which states: “The property rights of spouses prescribed by statute may be altered by a premarital agreement or other marital property agreement.” People often forget that the terms and conditions of marriage are already governed by law, specifically the California Family Code. A prenuptial agreement allows couples to change those standardized terms and conditions as they wish--within some reasonable limits, as discussed below.

What aspects of a marriage can a prenup affect?

California Family Code section 1612 outlines all matters a couple can address in a prenuptial agreement. Under this statute, a prenuptial agreement can modify rights and obligations of each spouse regarding property, the allocation of property, the makings of wills and trusts, death benefits, choices of governing law, spousal support, or any other matter that does not violate public policy, a criminal statute, or the right to child support.

As evidenced by the length of this list and the reference to “any other matter,” prenuptial agreements provide couples with an almost unlimited tool to customize their marriage contract.

What shouldn’t be in a California prenup?

An important rule in drafting prenups is that the terms cannot violate public policy. In California, preserving the power of the courts to act in the “best interests of the child” is a matter of public policy. See e.g. In re Marilyn H., 5 Cal. 4th 295, 307 (1993) (“the welfare of a child is a compelling state interest that a state has not only a right, but a duty, to protect.”). Therefore, couples would be well advised to avoid agreements that touch on the future rights of their children, such as child support or child custody. Including such terms in your prenup may be seen as violating public policy and invite a court to disregard those terms--or even the entire agreement.

Some attorneys recommend to their clients that they leave out mention of spousal support as well. This is because it is viewed as waiving an important marital right, which might leave one partner or the other in a vulnerable financial position after marriage.

In a California prenup, avoid any provisions that could be viewed by a court as “promoting divorce.” In California, it is against public policy to promote divorce. See In re Marriage of Noghrey, 169 Cal. App. 3d 326, 329 (Ct. App. 1985). Thus, a prenup which provides for a large payment to be made to one spouse only in the event of divorce (e.g. “I will pay you ten million dollars if we get divorced”) would likely be unenforceable as promotive of divorce.

Another public policy related to prenuptial agreements in California is the concept of “no-fault” divorce. A prenup that provided for penalties in the event of sexual infidelity was found to violate the public policy of “no-fault” divorce in California, since the agreement sought to find the offending party at fault and impose a penalty. See Diosdado v. Diosdado, 97 Cal. App. 4th 470 (2002).

When can I get a prenup?

Generally, you can get a prenup anytime before marriage. The prenuptial agreement of Barry Bonds was famously upheld by the California Supreme Court despite being signed the day before he married. However, the rules have become more strict since then--if one of the parties to the prenuptial agreement is not represented by an attorney, a seven-day waiting period applies under California Family Code section 1615(c) and the rule of In re Marriage of Cadwell-Faso & Faso, 191 Cal. App. 4th 945 (2011).

Nonetheless, it is recommended that you allow some time between executing the prenup and your wedding day to avoid any appearance that one partner was ambushed or forced to sign, which could invalidate the agreement.

Can my partner and I use the same attorney?

It is important for each partner contemplating a prenuptial agreement to have his or her own attorney. Not having your own independent attorney means that the agreement might be unenforceable in court. This is to ensure that the agreement is fair to both sides.

Technically, it is possible for both partners to use one attorney in relation to a prenuptial agreement, however ill advised. In order to do so effectively, it is critical that both partners sign separate documents waiving independent representation, as described in California Family Code 1615(c)(1).

What steps should I take before contacting an attorney?

For both partners, make a list of all of your personal assets and debts. This includes statements reflecting balances in bank and investment accounts, as well as any significant personal property (e.g. car, Picasso painting, golden statue) and real property (i.e. land, houses) that you own. For debts, the most common include student loans, mortgages, and credit card debt. Get your credit score and your partner’s. It is absolutely critical to note in your list any business that you have an ownership interest in before the marriage so that your attorney can take steps to keep your business separate from the marriage--unless you want to have your spouse as a business partner!

If you have any property that you already own jointly with your partner or joint bank accounts, take note of those items for your attorney. If you are planning to have children, and one partner is planning to be a stay-at-home parent while the other works, make sure to advise your attorney of these plans as well. If one partner has plans to go to college or graduate school full time while the other partner works to support them, let your attorney know. In general, it is best to have a comprehensive and open discussion with your partner and your attorney about your financial plans for your marriage, but starting with the points listed above will help you avoid some common pitfalls.


Do I really need a prenup?

This is a matter of opinion. Some attorneys take the position that partners should always have a prenuptial agreement before marriage to protect themselves and set the terms for their own marriage. Other attorneys say they are not necessary; some even view prenups as destructive to a nascent marriage.

Many attorneys will agree that for a young couple with relatively little assets, who are both getting married for the first time, a prenuptial agreement will have less importance. Such a couple has less at stake; without substantial initial personal assets, there will be little difficulty on divorce regarding distinguishing personal and community property. Conversely, individuals who are on their second marriage or beyond or who will be coming into the marriage with substantial personal property should seriously consider having a prenuptial agreement to ensure those assets are kept separate, if such is desired.

If you are considering a prenuptial agreement, it’s important to consult with an attorney as soon as possible to find out whether a prenup is right for you and your partner, and whether any particular terms one or both of you may be considering will be appropriate in a California prenup. If you’d like to learn more, please don’t hesitate to call or e-mail attorneys Ames Smith or Roxana Ahmadian today.
1 Comment

Legal Guardianship in California: what is it, and is it right for you?

3/12/2015

0 Comments

 
Authors: Roxana Ahmadian and Ames Smith

What is legal guardianship?

A legal guardian assumes temporary responsibility for a child, generally until the child turns eighteen. In California, a legal guardianship is established when a court appoints an individual to care for a particular child and/or the child’s property. Although some guardianship cases are handled in dependency court, the majority of guardianship cases actually take place in probate court.

How does legal guardianship differ from adoption?

Adoption permanently terminates the rights of a child’s birth parents and places those rights with a new parent or set of parents. In contrast, legal guardianship of a child only suspends certain rights of the parents temporarily and vests those rights in the appointed guardian instead.

Significantly, adoptive parents remain the legal parents of the child even into adulthood and beyond death. This is very different from guardianship. Legal guardians lose both their authority and responsibilities when the guardianship automatically terminates when the child turns eighteen, is adopted, marries, or dies. Courts may terminate a guardianship for other reasons as well: for example, when the child, guardian or parent successfully petitions for the court to terminate the guardianship, the court finds the guardianship is no longer necessary, or the court finds the guardianship is no longer in the best interest of the child.

What are the rights and obligations of a legal guardian?

Under legal guardianship, certain parental rights are suspended and vested into the guardians. These rights include the parents’ rights to physical and legal custody of the child. These rights, now vested in the guardian, impose the obligation as well as the authority to make decisions for the child normally made by a parent. Such decisions concern, for example, education, medical treatment, and general supervision.

Of course, there are certain limitations to the power of the guardian. For example, if the guardian wants to move the child out of California, the guardian must first get court approval. The guardian would also need court approval to permit the child to marry. Nonetheless, guardians have extensive powers, such as authority to consent to the child’s enlistment in the armed services, a decision that may follow the child well past the age of eighteen.

These rights and obligations can become a double-edged sword in some instances. For example, a guardian can give consent for the child to get a student driver’s license, but in doing so the guardian accepts both the obligation of paying for car insurance as well as any civil liability arising out of the child’s negligent and even intentional acts behind the wheel.

Are there different kinds of legal guardianship?

Temporary Guardianship

The time between filing a petition for general guardianship and a court hearing to decide the issue is generally six to eight weeks. That means that in many cases the child is without a much-needed guardian for two months. The solution to this predicament is a temporary guardianship. Temporary guardianship petitions are heard approximately five days after filing. Thus, when circumstances require the child to have a guardian as soon as possible, it is critical to file a petition for temporary guardianship simultaneously with the petition for general guardianship. The result of this double filing is that the child, instead of waiting in limbo, has a guardian appointed within a week on a temporary basis (provided the hearing goes well) until the date of the general guardianship hearing.

Joint Guardianship

In situations such as where a child’s parent has a life-threatening condition and wishes to share authority and responsibility for the child with another person without terminating their own parental rights, joint guardianship provides this option. In establishing a joint guardianship, the parent is not suspending his or her own parental rights, but rather sharing the authority and obligations with a third party. This third party, the guardian, will then be able to step in if or when the parent becomes too ill to care for the child.

Is legal guardianship right for me?

If you find yourself in a position in which you take care of someone else’s child, but find you run into problems due to your lack of authority in making decisions for the child, you should consider petitioning to become the child’s legal guardian. Depending on whether or not it is necessary to be appointed in less than two months, you might additionally consider a simultaneous petition for temporary guardianship. The individual petitioning to be appointed guardian is often a grandparent or other relative, but it’s worth noting that both related and unrelated guardians may be eligible for financial assistance.

If you care for a child only on occasion when the parent is dangerously ill, you and the parent should consider petitioning to be joint guardians so that you can avoid issues that arise when the parent becomes too ill to continue caring for the child.

Guardianship is appropriate when individuals are only seeking to suspend, not terminate, the parents’ decision-making rights for their child so that they themselves have the powers and duties over the child’s care. If the individuals are seeking to terminate the parent’s rights and become the child’s legal parents instead, then they should be looking into adoption. You can find out more about adoption and its different variants in our previous article: Independent vs. Agency Adoption: Which Is Best For Your Family?

0 Comments

Independent vs. Agency Adoption: Which Is Best For Your Family?

2/27/2015

1 Comment

 
Authors: Roxana Ahmadian and Ames Smith

One of the first decisions couples or individuals face after they have made the initial decision to adopt is who to trust to handle the adoption process. In California, there are two main options for handling domestic adoptions: either the independent or agency route. Figuring out whether to go with an independent adoption or to an agency can be confusing and frustrating. However, by understanding what the differences are between the two types of adoptions, and learning the advantages and disadvantages each has to offer, adopting families can better make an informed decision and reduce at least some of the frustration and inefficiency.

AGENCY ADOPTION

Historically, most couples or individuals interested in adoption would adopt through an adoption agency. Adoption agencies are licensed by the State of California to place children with adoptive parents. There are “public” and “private” agencies. Public agencies are generally operated by the Department of Social Services of the counties they serve. Private agencies are privately funded organizations. The child is first “relinquished” to the legal custody of a licensed adoption agency. This terminates the parental rights of the birth parents. The child is then placed by the agency with an adopting family approved by the agency.

It should be noted that agency adoption is the only avenue available for families who wish to adopt a child with “special needs” if that family wants to benefit from the Adoption Assistance Program (AAP). Under AAP, in an adoption conducted at least in part by a licensed agency, if the child is deemed to have “special needs,” the adopting family may be eligible to receive federal subsidies from the government to cover costs incurred as a result of the child’s condition. Therefore, if the adopting family knows, or has reason to believe, that the child they want to adopt has “special needs,” it is strongly recommended that the family contact an adoption attorney for specific guidance and strongly consider adoption through a licensed agency rather than an independent adoption.

In addition to the financial advantage of possible government funding for parents seeking to adopt a special needs child, there are other advantages of agency adoption which apply to any adoption. A major advantage of an agency adoption is that the process is subject to licensing and regulation by the State. One benefit of this is that upon the “relinquishment” of the child to the licensed agency, the birth parents’ parental rights are terminated. Therefore, the transfer of rights regarding the child goes from the parents to the agency and then to the adopting parents. This middle step reduces almost entirely the issue of birth parents changing their minds before the child is placed with the adopting parents. Another benefit of agency adoption is that agencies pre-screen adopting families prior to placement and provide counseling for all parties involved, which can often result in a smoother process and reduce miscommunication among the parties.

However, agency adoptions are not without their disadvantages. The biggest downside for most people interested in adopting is that agency adoptions usually involve long wait periods. It is common for agencies to have waiting lists of potential adoptive parents, and the wait is typically a few years or more. Also, a pre-placement home study is required for agency adoptions, and this can be expensive. Also agency adoptions use more “off the rack” processes with formulaic methods designed to try and fit all situations. The agency process has been characterized by some critics as intrusive, stifling, and bureaucratic. In agency adoptions, the birth parents have very little say in matters of the adoption.

INDEPENDENT ADOPTION

An independent adoption occurs when prospective adopting parents locate birth parents directly and arrange an adoption with the help of an attorney and without the use of an agency. It is noteworthy that the vast majority of newborn adoptions in California, as contrasted with adoption of infants and older children, are independent adoptions conducted by attorneys, with relatively few newborn adoptions conducted through agencies.

The chief advantage of an independent adoption is that both birth parents and adoptive parents have more freedom and control over the process. This is designer adoption which by its nature can be structured specifically to fit the needs and personalities of those involved. Many of the restrictions and red tape of an agency adoption can be avoided through an independent adoption. Among other things, this should result in substantial time saved over agency adoption -- independent adoptions generally involve far shorter waiting periods. Unlike agency adoption, independent adoption offers adoptive parents the option of having either a pre-placement home study through a private adoption agency or a post-placement home study through their state or county Department of Social Services.

Another major advantage of independent adoption is direct placement. Unlike agency adoption where birth parents relinquish their parental rights to the agency, an independent adoption allows the child to be directly placed with the adopting parents. Removing this middle step typically reduces or eliminates time in foster care. This is often very important to both sets of parents, who generally want to avoid exposure to the foster care system. Independent adoption also operates by “consent” rather than “relinquishment.” In agency adoptions, the birth parents “relinquish” their parental rights to the agency, making the agency the temporary “parents” of the child until placement. However, in independent adoptions, birth parents are required to “consent” to the adoption. This is good news for adopting parents who may want to avoid the child being placed in foster care, and can also serve the interests of birth parents, because it gives them a voice in the process and requires their agreement to the ultimate placement of their biological child.

Independent adoption has some disadvantages as well. Independent adoption is subject to regulation by the state, but because attorneys are not regulated to the same degree as agencies, the level of skill and professionalism varies from attorney to attorney. It is important to carefully consider the attorney you choose to conduct an independent adoption on your behalf. Additionally, unlike with agency adoption counseling is not going to be automatically available, so you should work with your attorney to make counseling arrangements.

Another major consideration of an independent adoption is that there is no agency serving to connect the prospective adopting parents with birth parents. Adopting parents must conduct their own search to locate a birth mother willing to allow adoption. The search for birth parents can be costly and time-consuming. Prospective adopting parents and their attorney must carefully screen responses to advertising to ensure that they are legitimate and that the birth parents are a good match for the adopting family.

For some, the lack of rigid structure and state regulation can be perceived as a disconcerting negative of independent adoption. Others may be wary of independent adoption because the birth parents have greater rights and more control than they otherwise would with an agency.

If you are considering adoption, you need professional advice from the start. Call us today!

Although agency adoptions have advantages, particularly for children with special needs, the vast majority of families adopting newborns choose to proceed with an independent adoption. With all of the concerns that come with the decision to put your child up for adoption, or to adopt a child into your family, most people want the most flexible, least costly, and overall parent-friendly approach to adoption. Independent adoption may fit those needs better than agency adoption. Protecting your child from being in foster care is reason enough for many to choose independent adoption. Avoiding the bureaucracy and red tape of agency restrictions may seal the deal for others.

No matter which method you choose to pursue for your family, it is always advisable to contact an adoption attorney for analysis and advice specific to your unique situation from the very start. If you would like to learn more, do not hesitate to contact us today via phone or email for a free initial consultation.

1 Comment

    Ames Smith

    Ames Smith is an experienced attorney in Los Angeles, California.

    Categories

    All
    Adoption
    Civil Law
    Employment Law
    Family Law
    Guardianship
    Prenuptial Agreements

    RSS Feed

Law Offices of Ames Smith, APC
9461 Charleville Blvd. #1197
Beverly Hills, CA 90212
Phone: (805) 419-5293
E-mail: [email protected]
Picture
© 2017 Law Offices of Ames Smith, APC
Disclaimer